Management of the Internal Quality Assurance System (SPMI) for Higher Education

Main Article Content

Tutik Sugesti

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to discuss or examine the management of the internal quality assurance system (SPMI) for higher education. The method used is literature study which is objective, systematic, analytical and descriptive. The conclusion of this research is: The internal quality assurance system (SPMI) is an effort to improve the quality of higher education. With the quality of Indonesian higher education still lagging behind other countries, this is a very big problem for Indonesian higher education today. The problem of the quality of higher education which is still low is the reason why the government provides a policy by introducing an internal quality assurance system (SPMI) in higher education. The internal quality assurance system (SPMI) is managed independently by the university concerned. Then, higher education quality management is carried out on an ongoing basis.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sugesti, T. (2023). Management of the Internal Quality Assurance System (SPMI) for Higher Education. Holistic Science, 3(3), 146–151. https://doi.org/10.56495/hs.v3i3.511
Section
Articles

References

Amstrong. 1977. The Process Education. New York: Vintage Boo.

Bambang Soehendro. Kerangka Pengembangan Pendidikan Tinggi Jangka Panjang 1996 – 2005. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI. Jakarta. 1996.

Dubrin, Andrew J., Principles of Leadership.Cangange Learning. Canada. 2010.

Husaini Usman. Manajemen Teori Praktik & Riset Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta. 2008.

Kis, Viktoria. Quality Assurance in Tertiary Education: Current Practices in OECD Countries and a Literature Review on Potential Effects, Thematic Review of Tertiary Education. OECD. Paris. 2005.

Mitchell, Terence, R, dan Larson, James, R, People in Organization, An introduction to organizational behavior. McGraw- Hill

Book. Singapure. 1987. Punang Amaripuja. Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Tinggi di Indonesia. Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta. 2007.

Kepemimpinan dalam Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Tinggi Render, Heizer. Production and Operation Management, Third Edition. Allyn and Bacon, A Division of Simon and Schuster. Needham Heidhts. 1993.

Republik Indonesia, Direktotar Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Pedoman Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Tinggi, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta. 2003.

Republik Indonesia, Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Strategi Jangka Panjang Pendidikan Tinggi 2003-2010 (HELTS), Mewujudkan perguruan tinggi berkualitas, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2004.

Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Pememrintah Nomor 19 Tahun 2005, tentang Standar Pendidikan Nasional, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia. Jakarta. 2005.

Rusman. Manajemen Kurikulum, Seri Manajemen Sekolah Bermutu. RajaGrafindo Persada. Jakarta. 2009.

Supeno Djanali. EPSBED (Evaluasi Program Studi Berbasis Evaluasi Diri), MANFAAT BAGI PIMPINAN PERGURUAN TINGGI, Direktorat Pembinaan Akdemik dan Kemahasiswaan, Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta. 2005.

Stoner, James, A.F. dan Wankel, Charles. Management. Prentice – Hall. New Yersey. 1986.

Tilaar, H.A.R., Standar Pendidikan Nasional, Suatu Tinjauan Kritis. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta. 2012.

Wagen, Van, Lynn dan Davies, Christina, Supervision and Leadership. Cassel Wellington House. London. 1998.

Most read articles by the same author(s)