Contribution Analysis of Cognitive Behavior Theraphy Approach in Group Guidance to Student Bullying Behavior
Article Sidebar
Cognitive Behavior Therapy,
Bullying Behavior
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study uses a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental type by looking at changes in research data between before and after being given treatment. The population in this study was 40 students of class XII then the sampling technique used purposive random sampling. The results of the reliability test of the bullying behavior character instrument were 0.911. The research data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon test. The research findings show that the correlation obtained from the SPSS output model summary 26.00 shows the magnitude of the results of the hypothesis test with the Wilcoxon test, the output is 2.807b with the value of Asymp.Sig. = 0.005 (2-tailed) is less than < 0.005, then Ha is accepted. Here there are 10 positive data (N) which means that 10 students experienced a decrease in bullying behavior from the Pre-Test value to the Post Test value. The mean rank or average increase is 5.50, while the number of positive rankings or the sum of Ranks is 55.00. Thus, it can be concluded that the application of the cognitive behavior therapy approach in group guidance can have an influence on the decline in bullying behavior of students at SMK Persatuan Amal Bakti 3 Medan TA. 2021/2022
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Alford, B. A., Beck, A. T., & Jones Jr, J. V. (1997). The integrative power of cognitive therapy.
Astuti, P. R. (2008). Meredam Bullying (3 Cara Efektif Mengatasi Kekerasan pada Anak). Jakarta: Grasindo.
Benitez, J. L., & Justicia, F. (2006). Bullying: Description and analysis of the phenomenon. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational of Psychology, 4 (9), 151-170.
Lee, C. (2004). Preventing bullying in schools: A guide for teachers and other professionals. Sage.
Lesmana, G. (2021). Teori dan Pendekatan Konseling. umsu press.
Maryam, S., & Fatmawati, F. (2018). Kematangan emosi remaja pelaku bullying. Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan dan Konseling, 3(2), 69-74.
Skinner, B. F. (1988). The selection of behavior: The operant behaviorism of BF Skinner: Comments and consequences. CUP Archive.
Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D.
Carney, A. G., & Merrell, K. W. (2001). Bullying in schools: Perspectives on understanding and preventing an international problem. School Psychology International, 22(3), 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034301223011
A.J McEachern, William. 2001. Pengantar Ekonomi Mikro. Jakarta: PT. Salemba Empat.
Rahayu, E. R. (2022). The Effect of Language Content-Based Cooperative Learning Against Public Speaking Skills. Indonesian Journal Education, 1(1), 35-40.
Lesmana, G., & Deliati, D. (2022). Parenting Patterns Based on Character Education Against Early Childhood Discipline. Indonesian Journal Education, 1(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.56495/ije.v1i1.176