Lexical Item Analysis in Speech by Unicef Executive Director Anthony Lake

Main Article Content

Najmi Fara Simatupang
Erlindawaty Erlindawaty

Abstract

This study deals in the lexical item analysis in Speech by UNICEF Executive Director Anthony Lake at the Harvard Conference on Adolescent Rights. This study aimed to find out the types of lexical item that focused on content word, function word and clause found in the Speech by Anthony Lake, to identify that often occurs on Speech by Anthony Lake, and to elaborate the reason for occurrence of dominant type in Speech by UNICEF Executive Director Anthony Lake at the Harvard Conference on Adolescent Rights. Descriptive qualitative research was applied in this study. The data of research were taken from Speech by Anthony Lake, 84 sentences found in this speech. The data were analyzed by identifying the speech into three types of lexical item in classifying the content word, function word and clause, analyzing the data into the each types of content word, function word and clause, calculating the types of content word, function word and clause, the most dominantly used in this speech, and finding the reason for occurrences of dominant type of content word, function word and clause on Speech by UNICEF Executive Director Anthony Lakeat the Harvard Conference on Adolescent Rights

Article Details

How to Cite
Simatupang, N. F., & Erlindawaty, E. (2023). Lexical Item Analysis in Speech by Unicef Executive Director Anthony Lake. Indonesian Journal Education, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.56495/ije.v2i1.339
Section
Articles

References

Astari, R. (2019). A Semantic Analysis of Difference Lexical Choices in Quran Translation 0f Indonesian and Dutch Version. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban, 302-321.

Chaer, A. (2015). Psikolinguistik: Kajian Teori. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta. Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. Essex, England: Longman.

Kempen, G., & Huijbers, P. (1983). The lexicalization process in sentence production and naming: Indirect election of words. Cognition, 14(2), 185– 209.

Lado, R. (1961). Language testing: The construction and use of foreign language tests. London, England: Longman.

Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–38.

Maftoon, P., & Shakouri, N. (2012). P.sycholinguistic Approach to Second Language Acquisition. The International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW. Vol 1 (1); 1-9 ISSN: 5389-2100.

McNeill, D. (1966). Developmental psycholinguistics. In F. Smith & G. A. Miller (Eds.), The genesis of language: A psycholinguistic approach (pp. 15–84). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Nasution, S. 1988. Metode Penelitian Naturalistik Kualitatif. Bandung: Tarsito

Palmer, F.R. 1981. Semantics: A New Outline. London: Cambridge UniversityPress.

Purba, N. (2018). The Role Of Psycholinguistics In Languge Learning and Teaching. Tell Journal, 47-54.

Riyono, A. (2018). Investigating Ideology Through Lexical Choice: A Critical Discourse Analysis of The Translated Novel“ The Dancer? and The Original “ Ronggeng Dukuh Paruk”. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 82.