Toulmin Model Based Argument Diagnosing: Constructing and Evaluating in The Argumention Essay in Indonesia Efl Text Book
Article Sidebar
English textbook
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to describe and explain Toulmin's argument patterns in the 2017 revised edition of the 2017 High School English textbook for class XI curriculum. This type of research is qualitative research using document analysis methods. The subject of this research is the 2017 revised edition of the 2013 curriculum 2013 high school English textbook. This book was written by Herman Benyamin. The object of this research is Toulmin's argument pattern. Analysis of the arguments in the discourse in the book is based on Toulmin's arguments whose components consist of Claim (C), Ground (G), Warrant (W), Backing (B), Qualifier (Q), and Rebuttal (R). After finding a pattern in each discourse, a conclusion is given. The results of this research show that this book contains patterns formed in discourse. From the results of Toulmin's argument analysis, in topic 1, patterns C (10%), RC (10%), GC (10), GQC (10%), GWC were found. (10%), GWBC (10%), GWQC (10%), GWRC (10%), GWBQC (10), GWBQRC (10%), Topic 2 is in C (14.3%), RC (0), GC (14.3%), GQC (14.3%), GWC (14.3%), GWBC (14.3%), GWQC (14.3%), GWRC (0%), GWBQC (14.3%), GWBQRC (0%). Discourse that does not have an argument is 20% and there are arguments that are not good according to Toulmin's argument. According to Toulmin, a good argument from this book is 85%, meaning that the presentation of this argument in the 2013 edition of the high school English textbook issued by the government can be said to be very good
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Alwi, H., Dardjowodjojo, S., Lapoliwa, H., & Moeliono, A.M. 2000. Indonesian Standard Grammar (Third Edition). Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Andriessen, J. (2006). Arguing to learn. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Aull, L. (2015). First-year university writing: A corpus-based study with implications for pedagogy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137350466.
Aull, L. L., & Lancaster, Z. (2014). Linguistic markers of stance in early and advanced academic writing: A corpus-based comparison. Written Communication, 31, 151–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088314527055
Bastardi, A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Ross, L. (2011). Wishful thinking: Belief, desire, and the motivated Evaluation of scientific evidence. Psychological Science, 22, 731–732. doi:10.1177/ 0956797611406447.
Boscolo, P., Arfé, B., & Quarisa, M. (2007). Improving the quality of students' academic writing: An intervention study. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701476092.
Clark, J. K., Wegener, D. T., &Fabrigar, L. R. (2008b). Attitude accessibility and message processing: The moderating role of message position.
Dong, Y. R. (1996). Learning how to use citations for knowledge transformation: Non-native doctoral students' dissertation writing in science. Research in the Teaching of English, 30, 428–457.
Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 39–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560187.
Erduran, S., and M. Jimenez-Aleixandre. 2007. International Journal of Science Education Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research.
Fernando, W. (2018). Show me your true colours: Scaffolding formative academic literacy assessment through an online learning platform. Assessing Writing, 36, 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.005.
Fitriyyah; Roudhotul. (2021). Process students' mathematical arguments in working on open ended questions based on gender.
Graves, Kathleen, 2000, Designing Language Courses: A Guide for Teachers, Canada: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Halpern, D.F. (1989). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking.
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Suartha, Setiawan, & Sudiatmika. 2020. Toulmin's Argument Pattern in the Learning Process IPA Junior high school. Scientific Journal of Education and Learning.
Hemberger, L., Kuhn, D., Matos, F., & Shi, Y. (2017). A dialogic path to evidence- based argumentative writing. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(4), 575- 607.
Hyytinen, H., Löfström, E., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2017). Challenges in argumentation and paraphrasing among beginning students in educational sciences. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61, 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1147072.
JimeÂnez Aleixandre, M.P., Pereiro Munoz, C., & Aznar Cuadrado, V. (1998, November). Promoting reasoning and argument about environmental issues. Research in Didaktik of Biology. Proceedings of the Second Conference of European Researchers in Didaktik of Biology. University of GoÈteborg, Sweden.
Johnson, R.H., & Blair, J.A. (1991). Contexts of informal reasoning: commentary. In Voss,J.F., Perkins, D.N., & Segal, J.W. (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 131-150). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kat Cooper, A., & Oliver?Hoyo, M. T. (2016). Argument construction in understanding noncovalent interactions: A comparison of two argumentation frameworks. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 1006–1018. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00109B.
Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Maharani, Anak, A.P. (2019). "Application of Problem Based Learning with Lesson Study Cycles to Improve Ability to Write Argumentative Essays". Journal of Linguistics and Literature. 11(1). 36-44.
Means, L.M., & Voss, J.F. (1996). Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels. Cognition and Instruction, 14(2), 139-178.
Miekley, Joshua, 2005, "ESL Textbook Evaluation Checklist. The Reading Matrix. 5(2), 1-9” Online Journal (www.readingmatrix.com/)Retrieved on October 20th, 2016.
Mudzakir, 2003, "Paper of the National Seminar on Arabic Language Teaching", JPBA FPBS Arabic Language Education Program UPI
Mukundan, Jayakaran, 2012, "Evaluative Criteria of an English Language Textbook Evaluation Checklist", Journal of Language Teaching and Research-Universiti Putra Malaysia, Vol. 3, No. 6, pp. 1128-1134.
Patronis, T., Potari, D., & Spiliotopoulou, V. (1999). Students' argumentation in decisionmaking on a socio-scientiFIc issue: Implications for teaching.
International Journal of Science Education, 21, 745-754.
Perkins, D.N., Farady, M., & Bushey, B. (1991). Everyday reasoning and the roots of intelligence. In Voss, J.F., Perkins, D.N., & Segal, J.W. (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 83-105). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Rakovi_c, M., Marzouk, Z., Chang, D., & Winne, P. H. (2019). Towards knowledge-transforming in writing argumentative essays from multiple sources: A methodological approach. In Companion proceedings 9th international conference on learning analytics & knowledge (LAK19). The Society for Learning Analytics Research (SoLAR).
Ranganath, K. A., Spellman, B. A., & Joy-Gaba, J. A. (2010). Cognitive "Category- Based Induction" research and social "Persuasion" research are each about what makes arguments believable: A tale of two literatures. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 115–122. doi:10.1177/ 1745691610361604.
Redhana, I.W. 2013. Problem-Based Learning Models for Improving Problem Solving Skills and Critical Thinking. Journal of Education and Teaching. Volume 46, No. 46. Hal.76-86.
Richards, Jack. C, 2001, The Role of Textbooks in a Language Program. http://www.professorjackrichards.com (accessed: 27 October 2016).
Rimbun, and Nesi (2021). Toulmin's Argument as a Basic Reference for Evaluating Construction of Text Arguments in Indonesian Language Test Instruments. Universitas Katolik Indonesia Santu Paulus Ruteng. https:// jurnal.unikastpaulus.ac.id/index.php/je.
Simon, Shirley, and Jane Maloney. 2007. “Activities for Promoting Small-Group Discussion and Argumentation.” School Science Review 88(324): 49
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1997). Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 342–357. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.89.2.342.
Tardy, C. M. (2005). "It's like a story": Rhetorical knowledge development in advanced academic literacy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.07.005
Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). Uses of argument (Updated edition). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1958).
Toulmin, Stephen, Richard Rieke, and Allan Janik. 1979/1984. An Introduction to Reasoning. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
Voss, J.F., & Means, M.L. (1991). Learning to reason via instruction in argumentation. Learning and Instruction, 1, 337-350.
Widiastiningsih, dkk. (2022). "Development of E-Modules based on Toulmin's Argumentation Patterns to Improve Student Arguments on Acid-Base Material". Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.2.410-414
Widyastiti, dkk. (2020). "the analysis of Toulmin's argument patterns in class XI high school chemistry textbooks". Mathematics and Science Forum: Journal of Mathematics, Science, and The learning. 14 (2).