Criminal Legal Responsibility for Motorcycle Taxi Drivers as Narcotics Couriers
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the legal accountability of motorcycle taxi drivers who act as narcotics couriers in Indonesia. Using a normative juridical method with an analytical prescriptive approach, the research analyzes laws and regulations related to narcotics crimes, the criminal responsibility of drivers, and the juridical review of the Unaaha District Court Decision Number 132/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.UNH. The findings indicate that the driver was proven to have unlawfully distributed Class I narcotics under Article 114 paragraph (2) of Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics. Although the driver initially claimed ignorance of the package contents, evidence from the trial demonstrated elements of intent or gross negligence. The study concludes that criminal liability depends on the driver’s awareness and intention; deliberate participation constitutes a punishable offense, whereas genuine unawareness may exempt the driver from liability. This research underscores the importance of assessing mens rea (intent) and actus reus (action) in determining accountability in narcotics-related offenses.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Mansar, A. (2021). Reconstruction of corruption law enforcement in the anti rasuah institution "Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK)” (based on approach ‘Berani Jujur Pecat’ (Dare Honest Fired)). Randwick International of Social Science Journal, 2(3), 316–325. https://doi.org/10.47175/rissj.v2i3.231
Mansur, D. M. A., & Gulton, E. (2009). Cyber law. PT Refika Adiatma.
Mertokusumo, S. (2003). Mengenal hukum: Suatu pengantar. Liberty.
Muhamad, F., Kristiawanto, K., & Ismed, M. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap perantara dalam tindak pidana narkotika. Blantika: Multidisciplinary Journal, 1(3), 180–188.
Muladi. (1995). Kapita selekta sistem peradilan pidana. Alumni.
Nuryanta, G. A. R. P., & Mahyani, A. (2022). Legal standing kurir ekspedisi mengirim barang berupa narkotika karena tidak mengetahui. Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 2(3), 675–702.
Oktaviani, S., & Yumitro, G. (2022). Ancaman bahaya narkoba di Indonesia pada era globalisasi. Jurnal Education and Development, 10(2), 137–143.
Rahmanda, B., & Jonathan, L. (2022). Implementasi perjanjian kerja pengemudi ojek online dengan perusahaan penyedia aplikasi. Gema Keadilan, 9(3), 275–286.
Rinaldo, R., Eddy, T., & Sahari, A. (2022). Penerapan rehabilitasi terhadap pelaku penyalahgunaan narkotika oleh penyidik kepolisian (studi di Direktorat Narkoba Polda Sumut). Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 14(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v14i1.281
Sihombing, E. N. A. M., & Hadita, C. (2022). Penelitian hukum. Setara Press.
Syifa, A. (2017, Desember 19). Dampak positif dan negatif ojek online. WordPress.com. https://ayusyifasfr.wordpress.com/2017/12/19/dampak-positif-dan-negatif-ojek-online/
Tim Redaksi Bisnis.com. (2019, Oktober 28). Bareskrim tangkap lima kurir narkoba jaringan Malaysia-Indonesia. Bisnis.com. https://kabar24.bisnis.com/read/20191028/16/1164051/bareskrim-tangkap-lima-kurir-narkoba-jaringan-malaysiaindonesia