Evaluation of Sewing Skills Program at Zere – Amin Course and Training Institute (LKP)
Article Sidebar
CIPP,
Sewing Skills,
LKP Zere AMIN
Main Article Content
Abstract
Evaluation of the sewing skills training program at the Zere AMIN Course and Training Institute (LKP) aims to assess the effectiveness of program implementation using the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model. This study uses a descriptive evaluative approach with mixed methods, namely qualitative and quantitative. The subjects of the study consisted of instructors and training participants, with data collection techniques in the form of questionnaires, observations, interviews, and documentation. The evaluation results show that this program is classified as very adequate in all evaluation components. The program is considered relevant to the needs of participants (Context), has adequate facilities, curriculum, and instructors (Input), implements an effective learning process (Process), and is able to improve participants' sewing skills and encourage them to be economically independent (Product). These findings indicate that the sewing training program at LKP Zere AMIN has succeeded in achieving its learning objectives and has a positive impact on community economic empowerment.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, S., & Jabar, C. S. A. (2010). Evaluasi program pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Harlen, W. (2007). Assessment of learning. London: SAGE Publications.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 559–603). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Mertens, D. M., & Wilson, A. T. (2012). Program evaluation theory and practice: A comprehensive guide. New York: The Guilford Press.
Moleong, L. J. (2012). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Siagian, S. P. (2004). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sudjana. (2005). Metoda statistika. Bandung: Tarsito.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tjiptono, F. (2008). Manajemen jasa. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
UNESCO. (2012). Transforming TVET: Building skills for work and life. Bonn: UNESCO-UNEVOC International Centre for Technical and Vocational Education and Training.
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
Worthen, B. R., Sanders, J. R., & Fitzpatrick, J. L. (1997). Educational evaluation: Theory and practice. New York: Longman.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Zainal, S. (2016). Evaluasi program: Konsep, prinsip, dan prosedur. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.