Do liquidity, solvency, and profitability affect technology firm growth? Evidence from Indonesia

Main Article Content

Winda Purnamasari
Suhardi Suhardi
Jufrisani Akbar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of liquidity, solvency, and profitability on the growth of technology companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2020–2024 period. The study used a quantitative approach with panel data obtained from the annual financial reports of 47 technology companies, resulting in 235 observations through a purposive sampling technique. Liquidity was proxied using the Current Ratio (CR), solvency using the Debt to Equity Ratio (DER), and profitability using Return on Assets (ROA), while company growth was measured using asset growth. Data analysis was conducted using panel data regression with a Fixed Effect Model selected based on the Chow and Hausman tests. The results showed that partially, liquidity, solvency, and profitability did not significantly influence the growth of technology companies. However, simultaneously, all three variables significantly influenced company growth, indicating that overall financial condition remains important in supporting company expansion. The coefficient of determination value indicates that the model is able to explain most of the variation in company growth. This finding indicates that technology company growth is more influenced by company-specific characteristics, innovation strategies, and digital business models than individual traditional financial ratios.

Article Details

How to Cite
Purnamasari, W., Suhardi, S., & Akbar, J. . (2026). Do liquidity, solvency, and profitability affect technology firm growth? Evidence from Indonesia. Economic: Journal Economic and Business, 5(2), 392–400. https://doi.org/10.56495/ejeb.v5i2.1595
Section
Articles

References

Almeida, H., Campello, M., & Weisbach, M. S. (2004). The cash flow sensitivity of cash. The Journal of Finance, 59(4), 1777–1804. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00679.x

Bates, T. W., Kahle, K. M., & Stulz, R. M. (2009). Why do US firms hold so much more cash than they used to? The Journal of Finance, 64(5), 1985–2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01492.x

Brown, J. R., Fazzari, S. M., & Petersen, B. C. (2009). Financing innovation and growth: Cash flow, external equity, and the 1990s R&D boom. The Journal of Finance, 64(1), 151–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01431.x

Carpenter, R. E., & Petersen, B. C. (2002). Capital market imperfections, high-tech investment, and new equity financing. The Economic Journal, 112(477), F54–F72. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00683

Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Peria, M. S. M., & Tressel, T. (2020). The global financial crisis and the capital structure of firms: Was the impact more severe among SMEs and non-listed firms? Journal of Corporate Finance, 60, 101514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.101514

Denis, D. J., & Sibilkov, V. (2010). Financial constraints, investment, and the value of cash holdings. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(1), 247–269. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp031

Fazzari, S. M., Hubbard, R. G., & Petersen, B. C. (1988). Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1988(1), 141–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/2534426

Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2009). Capital structure decisions: Which factors are reliably important? Financial Management, 38(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2009.01026.x

Hennessy, C. A., & Whited, T. M. (2007). How costly is external financing? Evidence from a structural estimation. The Journal of Finance, 62(4), 1705–1745. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01255.x

Kraus, A., & Litzenberger, R. H. (1973). A state-preference model of optimal financial leverage. The Journal of Finance, 28(4), 911–922. https://doi.org/10.2307/2978343

Lang, L., Ofek, E., & Stulz, R. (1996). Leverage, investment, and firm growth. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(95)00842-3

Leland, H. E., & Pyle, D. H. (1977). Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation. The Journal of Finance, 32(2), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/2326770

Lemmon, M. L., Roberts, M. R., & Zender, J. F. (2008). Back to the beginning: Persistence and the cross-section of corporate capital structure. The Journal of Finance, 63(4), 1575–1608. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01369.x

Myers, S. C. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 39(3), 575–592. https://doi.org/10.3386/w1393

Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0

Opler, T., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R., & Williamson, R. (1999). The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 52(1), 3–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00003-3

Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (1995). What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. The Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1421–1460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05184.x

Ross, S. A. (1977). The determination of financial structure: The incentive-signalling approach. The Bell Journal of Economics, 8(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003485

Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010

Titman, S., & Wessels, R. (1988). The determinants of capital structure choice. The Journal of Finance, 43(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb02585.x

Wu, X., & Yeung, C. K. A. (2012). Firm growth type and capital structure persistence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(12), 3427–3443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.08.008

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>