Benefits of Monitoring and Evaluation for Improvement Quality Teacher on Process Learning
Article Sidebar
Evaluation,
Quality Teacher
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research method is a qualitative method with a library study approach research). Data collection is carried out by searching for sources of information and summarizes information from various sources, including books, journals, and research has existed before. which has a relationship with monitoring and evaluation of enhancement quality Teacher. Study This aim so that reader can obtain deeper understanding of the benefits of monitoring and evaluation for improvement quality Teacher on process learning, started with look for and analyze literature relevant to the monitoring and evaluation research used for analyze. The results of this research discuss monitoring and evaluation education, Miscellaneous monitoring evaluation on education, characteristics monitoring and evaluation in education, and the benefits of monitoring and evaluation improving teacher quality. Monitoring helps identify obstacles teachers and provide appropriate interventions. Evaluation provides an overview of achievements Teacher to standard, support development professional, form base for increase quality teaching and results learning student in a way sustainable.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Arikunto, S. (2010). Basics Evaluation Education. Jakarta: Earth Script. 2010. Management Study .
Creswell, John. (2015). Research Education: Planning; Implementation; And Evaluation Research Qualitative & Quantitative .
References Student.
Cronbach, L. J., Ambrone, S. R., Dornbusch, S. M., Hess, R. D., Hornik, R. C., Phillips, D. C., Walker, D. F., & Weiner,
SS (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation . Citeseer. H Djaali, D. (2007). Psychology Education . Earth Script.
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning . Routledge.
Hermawati, H. (2022). Enhancement competence Teacher in carry out learning through monitoring evaluation sustainable. Journal of Educational Service Society (JPPM) , 3 (1), 31–35.
Indonesia, R. (2006). Regulation Government Number 39 Year 2006. About System Method Control And Evaluation.
Jakarta: Secretariat Country .
McKenzie, P., & Santiago, P (2005). Education and training policy teachers matter: attractive, developing and retaining effective teachers . OECD publishing.
Moerdiyanto, G. (2006). Models Monitoring And Evaluation (M. G, Ed.). Earth Script.
Nasihi, A., & Hapsari, Q. A. R. (2022). Monitoring And evaluation policy education. Indonesian Journal of Teaching and Learning (INTEL) , 1 (1), 77–88.
Son, L. V., Weather, A. M., & Safitri, H. B. (2020). Supervision Academic Based Monitoring And Evaluation For Coaching Teacher Pedagogy. Science Journal Education , 1 (2), 43–49.
Sani, R. A. (2014). Learning scientific For implementation curriculum 2013 . Earth Script.
Sudjana, N. (nd). Evaluation results process Study teach / Nana Sudjana | OPAC Library National R.I.
Retrieved April 4, 2024, from https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=586982
Sugiyono, P D. (2017). Method study business: approach quantitative, qualitative, combination, And R&D. Publisher CV. Alphabet: Bandung , 225 (87), 48–61.
Suryana, A. (2010). Strategy monitoring And evaluation (monev) system guarantee quality internal school. University Indonesian Education, Bandung .
Shamsuddin, M., Kuswara, K., Alexander, H., & Kusmiadi, A. (2015). History Directorate General Education Child Age Early And Education Public . Directorate General Education Child Age Early And Education Public.
TALIS - The OECD Teaching and Learning International Surveys - OECD . (nd). Retrieved April 5, 2024, from https:// www.oecd.org/education/talis/
Tilaar;, H. A. R. (2010). New paradigm of national education . //eperpus- bdkbandung.kemenag.go.id%2Fopac%2Findex.php%3Fp%3Dshow_detail%26id%3D302%26keywords%3D
Usman, m U. (2019). Become Teacher professional . PT TEENAGER ROSDAKARYA BANDUNG.